Constitutional Law expert, Ron Gibson joins Jim and Tim to break down who we really are.

 

James White              NorthWest Liberty News

 

If we are truly a government of the people, for the people and by the people, then why does the Federal Government exercise so much control over our lives?  A couple glaring examples of this would be the TSA inspired, mile-long lines at most major airports, and the “law” that we are required to buy health insurance from a private company; otherwise known as Obamacare.  Throw in all of the un-elected alphabet agencies whose sole purpose is to extract us, the American National, from our property, and you can see that the magnitude of tyranny has reached red-level status.  Ron Gibson is aware of all of this and has been battling these criminals for over 4 decades.

Ron is quite the “Renaissance Man,” as will be evidenced by his bio below, and we were delighted to have him on NorthWest Liberty News for an entire broadcast.  Please click the audio or video below to hear this extremely important and informative interview.

Ron’s Bio

Ron Gibson is a former US Marine and VietNam veteran who currently works as a professional consultant, Counselor at Law, with over 45 years of experience on the subjects of land patents, mining law, right of way, contracts, water rights, and Constitutional Law.  Raised on a ranch in Southern Oregon, his BA in Engineering and cattle ranching background has helped him to tackle many of the issues facing rural America today.

Ron has several gold and industrial mineral projects throughout the US.  He currently serves as Vice President of the South West Oregon Mining Association and is the chairman of the Jefferson Mining District located in southern Oregon.

A licensed pilot, Ron has a helicopter business and is the inventor of two environmental clean-up products.  Additionally, he is also involved in turbine engines, marine boat power plants and turbine propulsion projects for helicopters and airplanes.

His love of history and lifelong experience in cattle and horses has also served him well for his land, hay, alfalfa and high quality beef operations.  In his spare time Ron enjoys collectible auto restoration, raising quarter horses and paint horses, flying, and teaching classes on Constitutional law, mining law and land patents.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Please like & share:)
Ron Gibson: The Federal Government is a Foreign Entity

19 thoughts on “Ron Gibson: The Federal Government is a Foreign Entity

  • May 23, 2016 at 3:50 pm
    Permalink

    It is time to recognize that politicians of every stripe have been chiseling away at the Constitution since the Civil War. The Founding Fathers would have raised the alarm 150 years ago, and again 100 years later. Our Constitution is nothing more than an empty shirt that the feds drag out and put on stage to keep the gullible suitably entertained.

    Let’s face it. Constitutionalists are an extreme minority. The majority of this country lives out of the government trough and could care less about freedom so long as their bellies are full, their TVs are on, and the government promises them to solve all their problems. To restore our Constitutional freedoms would require a force of arms. But since we are outgunned, out-supplied, under-trained and outmanned, and since the weight of public opinion is overwhelmingly against us, any chance to prevail is non-existent.

    Reply
    • May 23, 2016 at 6:18 pm
      Permalink

      Rocky mention our Constitution has been under attack since 1860. Amending the Constitution is were the problem starts. First with the 14th Amendment, all the civil rights bills were base on the 14th Amend. Civil Rights bill are right out of the communist handbook. The other Amendments that destroyed the Constitution , are the 16th, 17th, 19th, and the 26th. If these Amendment were eliminated , we could restore this Country.

      Reply
      • May 23, 2016 at 6:51 pm
        Permalink

        I shake my head when I hear individuals clamoring for their damn “civil rights.” I want nothing to do with them. I am only interested in my god given rights as a sovereign individual ! Heck, the 14th amendment actually legalizes slavery, not to mention it creates your “straw man.”

        Reply
  • May 23, 2016 at 4:07 pm
    Permalink

    Keep up the good work Jim! The more people learn what’s going on, the better. Actually just a few days ago I heard an interview with John Rappaport (?), a journalist who used to be involved with a major network. He clearly stated in regards to our current government, Congress makes a Law and these gigantic Agencies interpret and use those new Laws to expand on making hundreds of new regulations that fit their Agendas. Each new regulation takes more of our Freedoms away. Hoping voters are waking up…..

    Reply
  • May 23, 2016 at 6:24 pm
    Permalink

    Ron Gibson mention the States losing it’s sovereign , the reason is because of the 14th Amendment and congress interruption of the Commerce Clause in Article 1 , of the Constitution.

    Reply
  • May 24, 2016 at 10:14 am
    Permalink

    Greetings Every one,

    The splinter in my mind has driven me toward seeking the truth.

    The more I find, the more it appears my spirit, or instinct, seems to be onto something.

    The U.S. Constitution Con: Why Freedom in the USA is an Illusion
    http://omnithought.org/u-s-constitution-con-why-freedom-in-usa-is-illusion/2568

    Servant King
    Intro: Confusion Programs 1 of 9
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-PJDVG1uak

    Servant King
    Intro- Unraveled Programs: 1 of 14
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GSRN7s3dxQ

    Ron would be especially interested in this one, but I recommend watching them all.

    Unraveled: 5 of 14 – “A Lame Claim”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW26zh5CheY

    One day we will gather in circles of truth and review all things, and hopefully begin anew.

    May the grace of God be upon us.

    Reply
  • May 24, 2016 at 10:39 am
    Permalink

    I haven’t read this yet but I’d like to comment on the title: the federal government is a foreign entity and has no jurisdiction.
    I have written the following to explain why “the federal government is a foreign entity and has no jurisdiction” is not true as long as the definition of “state” is still a statutory term (13 Stat 307 section 182 June 30, 1864) meaning : the territories and the District of Columbia.

    If you consider that Congress has passed a statute re defining the word state to the statutory term state and did it in 1864, the re definition of the word, state, from what we have been taught it to mean, to the territories and the District of Columbia, every entity called a state has been switched to a foreign entity since the passage of that act 13 Stat 307 section 182.
    Why? As I see it.
    the constitution is to guarantee the natural God given rights of the people living in the states that signed the Constitution for the United States of America. The powers of congress are in article 1 section 8. Clause 17 of section 8 says that a district for the seat of the government is authorized by the constitution is to be no more than 10 miles square and the constitution says it is foreign to the states when it says the power of congress is to exercise “exclusive legislative jurisdiction” over this district and the land purchased by the government or land ceded by the states for certain purposes like docks magazines and other needful buildings. The government’s district and the land ceded from the states are foreign to the states of the Union. This district was named the District of Columbia.
    So a state is no longer one of the 50 states of the union simply by congress changing this definition (of state) from what we know it to be (taught by government schools) and not telling us they did this.

    The 50 states of the union are, since 1864, either a territory or are in the district set aside by the framers (article 1 legislative branch, section 8 powers of congress, clause 17 – congress has exclusive legislative jurisdiction over the District and the land ceded to by one of the states or purchased by the government from other governments). Whether called a territory or the district, they are both jurisdictions foreign to the 50 states of the Union. I conclude that for any entity calling itself a state, the term state means that the 50 states of the Union are no longer a foreign jurisdiction to the District of Columbia or the territories, but are part of them: under the thumb of congress.
    The states are no longer foreign to the District of Columbia but part of it. The 50 states of the Union no longer exist since June 30, 1864. They are states which are defined by congress: territories and the District of Columbia.
    The constitution does not exist for the states and it does not protect the natural God given inalienable rights of people living in a state.

    Shortly after the june 30, 1864 re definition of state, congress gave these people in the newly defined states — that are now under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of congress, which is foreign to the original state– a substitute for inalienable rights to confuse them: They legislated in 1866 something called a Civil Right. Why would the people in the 50 union states need civil rights if they have inalienable rights which the was constitution was created to protect?
    Simple. The people no longer have inalienable rights if the congress decides to wipe them out. Exclusive legislative jurisdiction is what congress created of the 50 union states on June 30, 1864 with that new definition 13 Stat 307 section 182 Statutes at Large volume 13 page 307 section 182.
    Look up the definition of the word state for yourself here: http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/sal/sal.htm

    The new definition of state, which is foreign to and wipes out the original states, is why the Congress wrote the April 9, 1866 Act : to give the citizens of the territories and the District of Columbia rights which they deemed Civil Rights. source: 14 stat 27-30 (Statutes at Large volume 14 pages 27 to 30) http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/sal/sal.htm
    I personally believe that this re definition of state and the date June 30, 1864 is the only thing we need to remember to simplify what they did to us.
    This redefinition means to me that we cannot admit to live in a state when dealing with any government as all the states are a jurisdiction now foreign to the people that created it. A place where the people have no inalienable God given natural rights but only Civil Rights. A place where the Constitution for the United States of America does not exist. A place which has Civil Rights given to those there by congress, not inalienable rights given to us by God.
    Therefore, if you admit to living in an entity calling itself a state, then by definition you have moved from one of the 50 union states to the territories and District of Columbia. Congress can now tax you from cradle to grave where it can’t if you do not admit living in a state.

    How in the world can you get out of the state?
    1. You can’t have a state Driver License which is issued by an entity defining itself as a state (territory and District of Columbia) in which you agree that you have an address in a state.
    2. You can’t admit to a bank that you live in a state which you do when presenting the Driver’s License as ID. If you don’t have an address in a state, you can’t get a bank account. The banks are in the state. The Driver’s License is issued by a state so just by showing up at the Motor Vehicle Office, which has an address in a state, you are saying that you are living in a state. How do we opt out and get back to the Constitution and the original state?
    Congress has to repeal the definitions of state. I see no other way. The people have to tell them they know what they did and they were tricked and change it or else.

    The above is written to explain why “the federal government is a foreign entity and has no jurisdiction” is not true as long as the definition of state is still a statutory term meaning : the territories and the District of Columbia. source: 13 Stat 307 section 182 Statutes at Large volume 13 page 307 section 182.

    Look up the definition of the word state for yourself here: http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/sal/sal.htm

    Reply
    • August 8, 2016 at 9:19 am
      Permalink

      Ron Gibson confirms EVERYTHIGN my hubby and I found out in 1995….. excellent call… thank you for posting!!!

      Reply
    • August 8, 2016 at 9:19 am
      Permalink

      Ron Gibson confirms EVERYTHIGN my hubby and I found out in 1995, and confirmed since then….. excellent call… thank you for posting!!!

      Reply
  • May 25, 2016 at 7:13 pm
    Permalink

    I am a Patriot and enjoyed your news.. I like to learn more about the Land Patent, get all the case law and format to obtain Land Patent. Hope to be able to reach ron Gibson to learn more about the Land Patent. Thank you.

    Edwin Nassar

    Reply
  • January 21, 2017 at 3:53 am
    Permalink

    Wow! I’m enlightened! What’s are remedy or is one even possible!

    Reply
  • January 21, 2017 at 3:56 am
    Permalink

    Wow! What an eye opener! What’s the remedy
    And is it possible!!!!

    Reply
  • September 23, 2018 at 12:18 pm
    Permalink

    благоустроенный веб сайт [url=https://xn—–6kcacs9ajdmhcwdcbwwcnbgd13a.xn--p1ai/]томск стоматология[/url]

    Reply
  • September 23, 2018 at 6:09 pm
    Permalink

    One of the unique methods of entertainment since long has been television. Technologies have advanced much and new modes of watching TV have come up. With advent of internet, you have latest method to watch TV online. There are some of the amazing technologies that have come to help you watch TV online with internet TVs. Online TV is a great way that helps you to watch TV shows with online means. With this internet television, you have better means of watching all TV shows without getting a television set.You can watch so many television shows and every channel with the help of satellite TV for PC. The best thing about these internet televisions is that they are free of cost. You need not have to pay anything for cable charges. You need not have to spend a penny for watching television with the help of satellite TV for software PC. You can watch all channels and you can get good clarity with them.Benefits of Internet TVs over the traditional oneThese internet televisions have good benefits over the traditional way of watching television. Firstly, with the help of the satellite TV for PC, you have lot many advantages of watching all channels. You may not be able to watch all those channels in traditional way. Watching Television with the help of satellite TV for software PC helps you to watch thousands of channels at your computer. Secondly, internet television does not require any cable connection as everything is done from satellite. However, if you want to get good number of channels in traditional TV, you need a cable connection. Thirdly, you can watch satellite TV on PC with free of cost as you do not have to pay anything for watching TV and every cost is included in internet charges that is fixed for amount of internet used. In case of traditional one, you need to pay for the channels. All these reasons make internet TV a boom. Internet television has become a good source of entertainment lovers.Watching all programs live is a great source for all those who are entertainment seekers. It is of great excitement to watch live TV programs as that gives you immense pleasure. You can watch whatever interests you, music, sports, politics etc. these online TV shows gives you immense feeling of pleasure when you watch it through satellite TV for software PC. Watching online TV shows gives you immense thrilling experience and the best part of this is that you can watch TV at your own convenient time. You do not have to turn on TV when you are busy in work. Just connect to your internet and you can watch the TV shows at your own convenient time. Satellite television for PC has come to give you great timing and space flexibilities to know enough for the internet TVs.

    Reply
  • October 9, 2018 at 1:39 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Ron , I do have a question , I am retired and on social security , if I do a property patent will I loose my
    social security , I live In Long Island New York , thanks for your time , Joseph Siachitano .

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Font Resize
Contrast