Following all of the attention over the past couple of years regarding the abusive nature of the Bureau of Land Management and the controversy over land that has been unconstitutionally grabbed by the DC government, things are finally coming to a head. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) has put forth a piece of legislation that would “terminate the law enforcement functions of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management and to provide block grants to States for the enforcement of Federal law on Federal land under the jurisdiction of these agencies, and for other purposes.”

HR 4751 is titled “Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act.” The bill does the following:

  • Terminates the law enforcement function within BLM and Forest Service.
  • Provides block granted funding to local law enforcement.
  • Deputizes local law enforcement to defend federal land.
  • Establishes a formula to reimburse local governments for law enforcement on public lands based on the percentage of public land in each state.
  • ​Restores responsibility for law enforcement to elected officials who are accountable to the local community.

“Federal agencies do not enjoy the same level of trust and respect as local law enforcement that are deeply rooted in local communities,” Chaffetz said in a statement. This legislation will help de-escalate conflicts between law enforcement and local residents while improving transparency and accountability. The BLM and Forest Service will be able to focus on their core missions without the distraction of police functions.”

Chaffetz has the support of the Utah Sheriffs’ Association as well.

In a March 16 letter to Chaffetz from Sheriff Robert Dekker, President of the Utah Sheriffs’ Association, he wrote, “Last week the Utah Sheriffs Association met with you and your staff in reference to the Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act at the Utah State Capitol. Utah Sheriffs have a strong heritage in keeping the authority of the Sheriff a top priority. The Utah Sheriffs Association has seen federal officials try and usurp this authority by enacting laws and regulations that mirror state law. They have dealt with aggressive and over reactive federal land agents and have joined with other Western States Sheriffs in the same issues.”

“The Utah Sheriffs Association applauds you in recognizing this problem and reigning [sic] in these federal land management agents,” Dekker added. “We support this bill 100% and would like to help in any possible way. Thank you for looking out for Utah Sheriffs and the authority our constituents and the constitution has granted us.”

So far, Chaffetz has five co-sponsors: Reps. Rob Bishop (R-UT), Chris Stewart (R-UT), Mia Love (R-UT), Dan Newhouse (R-WA), and Paul A. Gosar (R-AZ).

One month prior to Chaffetz’s legislation being introduced, Sheriff Marty Gleave spoke before the Rural Caucus of the Utah State legislature and warned that he would ” deputize every man, woman and child in the county to stop what’s going on” with the BLM and the US Forest Services.

The bill comes almost two months after the Oregon State Police and FBI murdered peaceful protester and unarmed LaVoy Finicum in an ambush that appears to have been authorized by the White House through the Governor’s office. Several protesters from the Bundy Ranch siege, who also protested peacefully against hundreds of armed BLM agents, have been arrested and there appear to be more arrests in the future. My fellow Americans, the issue of the totalitarian BLM and the protests at Bundy Ranch, Oregon and the case of the Hammond family ranchers being imprisoned for doing what ranchers do yet the BLM does the same thing, only criminally, needs to continue to be pushed to the front of the news cycle. Contact your congressman and urge them to get behind this legislation.

Article reposted with permission from The Washington Standard.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Please like & share:)
BLM’s Law Enforcement Powers to be abolished in New Legislation

6 thoughts on “BLM’s Law Enforcement Powers to be abolished in New Legislation

  • March 28, 2016 at 11:35 am
    Permalink

    Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 says that the federal government can’t own
    land outside of the 10 miles square unless it was purchased from a state for Forts Magazines and all other needful buildings.

    How is this vacant land a needful building??
    These sheriffs backing this legislation haven’t read or don’t understand the constitution.
    That said the sheriff can keep the feds out of the county if he so chooses to.

    It is really very easy and straight forward. Article 1 section 8 clause 17 reads:
    To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

    Reply
  • March 30, 2016 at 6:10 am
    Permalink

    That’s good. That’s just common sense.

    I foresee some layoffs and sequestering coming to those in Federal Places like the BLM,FBI,NSA,CIA in 2017. So everybody is going to have to tighten up their belt and learn to live on a much leaner diet physically,spiritually,socially and politically,corporately and governmentally.

    This is a really good thing. A healthy thing. Alot like fasting. The thought of it and the process of it might feel like it’s going to kill your fat ass. But in the long run you learn to appreciate food and what you got more. And then before you know it you come out of it and it really wasn’t nearly as bad as your own mental block you allowed set up in mind told you it was going to be for you and everyone.

    PTL!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Font Resize
Contrast