Eric Holder Claims Mueller Already Has Charges Ready Against Trump

1
201

Here’s the first problem, you have to impeach the guy before you can charge him with anything.  Still, the man that was held in contempt of Congress because he was trying to coverup his role in Operation Fast and Furious in which he and the ATF knowingly allowed thousands of guns, many of them his Party wants to ban, be trafficked across the border into the hands of Mexican drug cartels, has come and claimed that Special Investigator Robert Mueller has prepared charges against President Donald Trump.

The Daily Caller reports:

Former Attorney General Eric Holder believes special counsel Robert Mueller already has plans to charge President Donald Trump with obstructing justice.

Mueller is holding back on charging Trump until he can make sure he has the president dead-to-rights, Holder, who served under former President Barack Obama, said Friday night on HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher.” He has made similar arguments in the past regarding Trump’s behavior.

“You technically have an obstruction of justice case that already exists,” said the former Obama Attorney General.  “I’ve known Bob Mueller for 20, 30 years; my guess is he’s just trying to make the case as good as he possibly can. So, I think that we have to be patient in that regard.”

Nevermind, Holder’s continued obstruction of justice with his contempt of Congress and not turning over subpoenaed documents, which Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah covered for via executive action.

However, the problem is that Mueller cannot make any formal charges against Trump while he is in office.  Even liberal Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz acknowledges this.

In December, Dershowitz said, “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate.  That’s what Thomas Jefferson did, that’s what Lincoln did, that’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

Of course, when Donald Trump got wind of Holder’s claims, he tore into him.

“I don’t want to get into loyalty, but I will tell you that, I will say this: Holder protected President Obama. Totally protected him,” Trump said in the New York Times interview. “When you look at the things that they did, and Holder protected the president. And I have great respect for that, I’ll be honest.”

But Holder told Maher, “The difference between me and Jeff Sessions is that I had a president I didn’t have to protect.”

Ha!  That’s a good one there, Eric!

Is that why we’ve documented nearly 1,200 of Obama’s lying, hypocrisy, lawbreaking, cronyism, and waste?  No, Eric Holder covered just as much for Obama, if not more, than Loretta Lynch did.

Fine, if Bob Mueller has charges in the wings, let him bring them forward.  Otherwise, Holder is all about nothing.  I’m wondering why he is still considered relevant?  He helped to put weapons in the hands of Mexican drug lords that resulted in the deaths of two federal agents, a Mexican beauty queen and hundreds of Mexicans.  Why is this man going on any TV show pontificating about anything?  He should be in handcuffs facing a trial!

Please like & share:)

1 COMMENT

  1. as well..Louis Lerner was recommended for Contempt charges under H.Res.574 (2014) I”d recommend we all refresh ourselves as to who does what to whom, under our system. When the democrats went after harriet myers, (under Bush) they chose to file a Federal lawsuit instead of recommending prosecution to the DC Attorney, under the relevant Statute. “Contempt of Congress is defined in statute, 2 U.S.C.A. § 192, enacted in 1938, which states that any person who is summoned before Congress who “willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a maximum $1,000 fine and 12 month imprisonment. This is not as black/white as it appears. Holder was an Executive Branch functionary at the time, and there are valid Constitutional arguments (unitary executive) to be made that the office of the AG is under exclusive jurisdiction of the President. The buck stopped at Obama. “Following a contempt citation, the presiding officer of the chamber is instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia; according to the law it is the duty of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury for action. -current US Attorney for the District of Columbia= Jessie K. Liu (appointed by Trump & approved by the Senate in 2017.)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here